Rouge Classification Guide | ASME BPE Standards | Pharmaceutical Water Systems | CXP Solutions
📋 ASME BPE-2019 Technical Reference

Rouge Classification & Derouging Technical Guide

Comprehensive reference for rouge identification, classification, and remediation in pharmaceutical water systems per ASME BPE-2019 standards. Includes Class I, II, III specifications, analytical methods, removal protocols, and re-passivation requirements per ASTM A967.

🔬 Class I, II, III Rouge ⚗️ Chemical Derouging 📊 Analytical Methods ✓ ASTM A967 Re-passivation 📋 FDA Audit-Ready
3 Rouge Classes Defined
7+ Analytical Methods
ASME BPE-2019 Compliant
100% GMP Documentation

What Is Rouge & Why It Matters

Rouge refers to iron oxide deposits on stainless steel surfaces in high-purity water systems, particularly those operating under USP water specifications. These deposits indicate active or historical corrosion processes that can compromise system integrity, product quality, and regulatory compliance per FDA 21 CFR 211.67.

The ASME BPE-2019 standard (Section SD-3.13) defines rouge classification based on physical characteristics, chemical composition, and removal difficulty. Understanding these classifications is critical for selecting appropriate remediation protocols per ASTM A967 and ASTM A380 standards.

⚠️
Product Contamination Risk
Rouge particles migrate through WFI loops, contaminate product streams, and trigger batch rejections during pharmaceutical manufacturing.
⚠️
FDA Compliance Issues
Visible rouge is a common FDA 483 observation. Systems must demonstrate appropriate derouging and re-passivation programs.
⚠️
Bioburden & Particle Counts
Rough iron oxide surfaces harbor bacteria, prevent effective CIP cleaning, and increase particle counts in purified water.

Proper rouge remediation requires accurate classification, appropriate chemistry selection, complete removal verification, and mandatory re-passivation per ASTM A967 protocols.

Bioprocessing Equipment — Rouge classification & surface requirements
Chemical passivation treatments for stainless steel parts
Cleaning, descaling & passivation of stainless steel
Water and Steam Systems (Third Edition)
Equipment cleaning and maintenance requirements

Rouge Classification System (ASME BPE)

Click each classification below for detailed specifications, formation mechanisms, and treatment protocols

Class I Rouge

Loosely Adherent External Contamination — Easiest to Remove

I

External iron/iron oxide contamination that migrates through the system and deposits in low-flow areas. Does not originate from the substrate surface. Typically found in systems with inadequate velocity calculations or improper chemical treatment.

Physical Properties
• Particle size: 0.1–10 μm
• Color: Orange to red-brown
• Easily removed by wiping
• No substrate bonding
Chemical Composition
• Fe₂O₃ (hematite) dominant
• FeO(OH) (goethite) present
• Cr:Fe ratio >0.5
• External contaminants possible
Common Locations
• Tank bottoms (horizontal surfaces)
• Dead legs (L/D >6)
• Post-valve turbulence zones
• Spray ball shadow areas
Treatment Protocol
Citric acid 0.5–2% at 50–60°C
• Contact time: 2–4 hours
• Flow velocity: >5 ft/s
• Verification: Fe <10 ppb

Class II Rouge

Moderately Adherent Corrosion Product — Chemical Removal Required

II

Corrosion product formed at the stainless steel surface under oxidizing conditions, typically in hot water systems above 65°C. Requires chemical removal and mandatory re-passivation per ASTM A967.

Physical Properties
• Thickness: 0.1–0.5 mm
• Color: Dark red to purple
• Uniform surface coating
• Chemical removal required
Chemical Composition
• Fe₃O₄ (magnetite) dominant
• FeCr₂O₄ (chromite) present
• Cr:Fe ratio 0.1–0.5
• Ni enrichment possible
Formation Mechanism
• Chloride-induced pitting
• High temperature oxidation
• Inadequate passivation
• Thermal cycling stress
Treatment Protocol
• 4–6% citric + EDTA chelant
• Temperature: 60–70°C
• Contact time: 4–8 hours
• Multiple treatments typical

Class III Rouge

Tightly Adherent Scale with Substrate Damage — Most Severe

III

Severe corrosion with subsurface metal alteration. Often requires aggressive chemical treatment or electropolishing. May necessitate equipment replacement if substrate integrity is compromised per ASME B31.3 criteria.

Physical Properties
• Thickness: Up to 1 mm
• Color: Black to dark gray
• Subsurface penetration
• May require mechanical removal
Chemical Composition
• Fe₃O₄ with metal inclusions
• Cr content <1%
• Severe Cr depletion
• Carbide precipitation possible
Typical Locations
• Weld HAZ (Heat-Affected Zone)
• Pure steam generators
• Crevices and gasket faces
• Never-passivated systems
Remediation Options
• 10–15% phosphoric acid
• Electropolishing required
• 12–24 hour treatments
• Consider component replacement

Rouge Classification Comparison Matrix

Quick reference for identification, chemistry selection, and treatment parameters by rouge class

Parameter Class I Class II Class III
Visual Appearance Orange to red-brown, powdery Dark red to purple, uniform coating Black to dark gray, scale/pitting
Adherence Level Loosely adherent (wipes off) Moderately adherent Tightly adherent, integrated
Surface Damage None — external contamination Minor — surface-level Severe — subsurface penetration
Primary Chemistry Citric acid 0.5–2% Citric 4–6% + EDTA chelant Phosphoric 10–15% or HNO₃ blend
Temperature Range 50–60°C (122–140°F) 60–70°C (140–158°F) 70–80°C (158–176°F)
Contact Time 2–4 hours 4–8 hours (multiple cycles) 12–24 hours (multiple cycles)
Re-passivation Recommended MandatoryASTM A967 Mandatory — Extended protocol
Typical Removal Time 4–8 hours total 1–2 days 2–5 days or equipment replacement

Analytical Methods for Rouge Characterization

Proper classification requires appropriate analytical techniques to determine rouge type and severity

👁️

Visual Inspection

Initial assessment per ASME BPE SD-3.13. Color, coverage pattern, and distribution provide first indication of rouge class.

Standard: ASME BPE-2019
Detection: Qualitative only
Use: Initial classification
🧪

Swab Testing

Surface sampling for quantitative metal analysis. Determines Fe, Cr, Ni content per USP methodology.

Standard: USP <231> / <233>
Detection: 1–10 μg/swab
Use: Surface contamination level
📊

ICP-MS Analysis

Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry for ultra-trace metal quantification in rinse water.

Standard: ASTM E1479
Detection: 0.1 ppb
Use: Post-treatment verification
🔬

SEM/EDX Analysis

Scanning Electron Microscopy with Energy Dispersive X-ray for morphology and elemental mapping.

Standard: ASTM E1508
Detection: 0.1–1.0 wt%
Use: Detailed characterization
💎

XRD Analysis

X-Ray Diffraction for crystalline phase identification. Determines specific iron oxide compounds present.

Standard: ASTM D934
Detection: 1–5 wt%
Use: Compound identification

Electrochemical Testing

Cyclic polarization and potentiodynamic scans to evaluate pitting potential and corrosion rate.

Standard: ASTM G61
Detection: mV/decade
Use: Corrosion resistance evaluation

CXP Derouging & Re-Passivation Process

Our systematic approach ensures complete rouge removal with mandatory re-passivation per ASTM A967

1

Rouge Assessment & Classification

Comprehensive visual inspection with documentation. Swab testing at critical locations. Classification determines chemistry selection and treatment duration.

Deliverable: Rouge assessment report with classification, photographic documentation, and recommended treatment protocol per CXP derouging standards.
2

Pre-Operational Cleaning

Alkaline degreasing at 140–160°F removes organic contamination that interferes with derouging chemistry. Flow velocity verification ensures complete system coverage.

Chemistry: Pharmaceutical-grade alkaline cleaner. Temperature and contact time logged per GMP documentation requirements.
3

Chemical Derouging Cycle

Class-specific chemistry circulated at controlled temperature. EDTA-enhanced formulations for Class II/III. Multiple cycles for heavily contaminated systems. Real-time concentration monitoring.

Parameters: pH 1.5–3.0, temperature 50–80°C, contact time 2–24 hours depending on classification. Continuous recirculation with filtration.
4

Neutralization & Rinse

Complete acid neutralization followed by multiple WFI/DI rinse cycles. pH and conductivity monitoring to source water baseline. System drain and dry air/N₂ purge.

Acceptance: pH 6.5–7.5, conductivity matching source water, no visible residue, Fe <10 ppb in final rinse.
5

Re-Passivation (Mandatory)

Citric acid passivation per ASTM A967 Practice 3. 4–10% concentration at 60–71°C for controlled contact time. Restores protective chromium oxide layer.

Critical: Re-passivation is mandatory after any derouging procedure. Skipping this step results in rapid rouge recurrence and accelerated corrosion.
6

Verification & Documentation

Copper sulfate test, ferroxyl test, water break test per ASTM A967. Complete documentation package including all test results, chemical certificates, and before/after photography.

Deliverable: FDA audit-ready documentation package with batch records, verification test results, and final passivation certificate.

Rouge Prevention & Control Strategies

Prevention is more cost-effective than remediation. Implementation of these strategies can reduce rouge formation by >90%

🏗️ Design Considerations

  • Eliminate dead legs (L/D <6 per ASME BPE)
  • Maintain velocity >3 ft/s — use flow calculator
  • Specify 316L or AL-6XN stainless steel
  • Electropolish critical surfaces (Ra <0.5 μm)
  • Orbital welding with proper purge
  • Calculate system volume for proper treatment

⚙️ Operating Parameters

  • Temperature <65°C when possible
  • Conductivity <1.3 μS/cm
  • TOC monitoring <500 ppb
  • Chloride <50 ppb
  • Dissolved O₂ <20 ppb for hot systems
  • Proper water treatment per technical water guide

🔧 Maintenance Program

  • Annual passivation schedule
  • Quarterly borescope inspections
  • Monthly water quality testing
  • Preventive derouging before Class II develops
  • Trend analysis and documentation
  • Coupon analysis program

📋 Monitoring Protocols

  • Visual inspection schedule at defined locations
  • Borescope surveys annually
  • Iron testing <10 ppb acceptance
  • Swab testing at problem areas
  • Predictive maintenance metrics
  • GMP documentation per 21 CFR 211.67

Related Technical Resources

Additional guides, calculators, and technical references for high-purity system maintenance

Rouge Contamination Requires Expert Remediation

Don't risk FDA observations or product contamination. CXP Solutions specializes in rouge classification, derouging, and re-passivation per ASME BPE and ASTM standards. Zero accidents in 10+ years. Owner involvement on every project.

Scroll to Top